Marketing Ops Journal

Insights & Tips

Already a subscriber? Login

Become a subscriber and unlock an information arsenal focused on building effective marketing operations.

Comparing Close Rates the Right Way

During the subscriber webinar, How to Improve Your Close Rates, an attendee asked a question that lots of people can probably relate to:

We track and compare close-rates by sales rep. But sales managers always seem to brush-off the massive variances we’re showing as being “mix related”. Any suggestions?

Now, the person asking the question was probably hoping to get some tips, suggestions, or Jedi mind-tricks for getting their sales managers to stop being so obstinate, and actually do something about the poor performers.

But in this case, I had to be the jerk who actually agreed with sales management. After all, is it reasonable to expect that sales reps would have similar closing ratios on very different types of opportunities? Really? No way.

You see, unless every opportunity is similar— the same products, in the same quantities, to the same types of customers, under very similar circumstances—it’s hard to draw accurate conclusions about differences in salespeople’s overall close-rates. If each salesperson’s mix of opportunities is different, then it’s reasonable to expect that their close-rates would be different as well.

And therein lays the answer…

If you want to compare close-rates by salesperson in a credible way, you first need to create buckets (or segments) of opportunities that are very similar in makeup—i.e. similar products, similar deal sizes, similar customers, and so on. The deals in each of these “opportunity segments” need to be so similar that even the most stubborn sales manager would have to agree that it’s reasonable to expect similar conversion performance.

In a sense, by segmenting the opportunities first, you’re “mix adjusting” each salesperson’s closing ratios and thereby making it much more difficult to brush-off big variances.

Of course, the bigger question here is whether you really want to be doing this type of salesperson-focused analysis in the first place? I mean, it’s one thing to do it because management is requesting that it be done. But it’s quite another thing to be calling-out individual reps on your own initiative.

All things considered, I’d say that this is definitely one of those situations where if you’re going to do it, you’d better do it right!

Discover the exclusive tools and research that subscribers get access to.

Take Our Quick Tour

Related Resources

  • Three Types of Buyers That Don't Buy on Price

    Research says that 60-70% of buyers aren't price buyers---lower your price for them and you just give margin away. Learn how to identify the types of buyers where additional discounts won't help you win the business.

    View This Diagnostic
  • Competitive Kill Sheet Development Workbook

    To help you gather and distill the essential information to create effective competitive kill sheets, answer the questions in these worksheets with as much detail as possible. An example of a fictitious competitive kill sheet is provided at the end of the workbook.

    View This Tool
  • Generating More Sales from Existing Customers

    Many B2B companies struggle to identify untapped sales opportunities and maximize revenue from the customers they've already acquired. In this four-part recorded training session, learn what leading sales operations are doing differently to grow share-of-wallet with existing customers.

    View This Webinar
  • How Customers Evaluate a Price

    We'd like to think that customers are always rational when they consider the price on a deal...but they aren't. In this guide, Mark Dresdner exposes eight factors that play an important role when a potential customer evaluates a price.

    View This Guide